The historical developer answer
For a safe discussed on February 4, 2026, the developer wrote left 35 → right 60 → left 0 in a Steam reply. The developer also described slowing the dial near a number to hear a click. This is a verified record of what the developer said for that puzzle at that time. It is not proof that every safe, every room or the current patch uses an identical final input.
Why the final digit is unresolved
A February 6 video description labels a Therapy Room safe as 35–60–01. Its last value differs from the developer’s 0, and the research could not read the video’s dial at the needed frame or find a third independent answer. The difference might reflect a leading zero, a typo, another safe or a version change, but none of those explanations was verified. The current unique final digit is therefore 待确认; this page does not choose one value silently.
Check the correct lock
In the same Steam discussion, a player reported trying the safe advice on a locker whose dial only went to 35. The developer clarified that the advice was for a different safe, whose dial reaches 60. Check the object and dial range before treating any published combination as relevant. The separate locker-code guide covers the Prologue locker and the full-game first-floor clue without mixing them with this safe.
What patch 1.1.2 changed
The official 1.1.2 notes say the safe puzzle was made easier to complete. They do not give a revised combination or name the video’s Therapy Room safe. An easier interaction can affect how an old demonstration feels without establishing that its numbers changed. The February developer answer should be labeled historical until a current in-game reading resolves the final digit.
What to verify in game
Confirm that you are at the same safe discussed by the developer, then compare the dial’s range and the clue physically associated with that room. Record whether the last marking is displayed as 0 or 01 on your current build; the collected public material cannot settle it. If the object is a locker or a different safe, neither historical sequence should be treated as its solution. No verified post-1.1.2 screenshot of the final reading was available in the research.